An opinion piece by Tapu Misa for the NZHerald conveys doubt that the retrial represents the truth.

Michael Bain, brother of Robin speaks out to clear his brother's name.

Deborah Coddington made some reasoned comments immediately after the Privy Council demanded a retrial.  Joe Karam immediately responded in his usual inflammatory manner with this

Many, like members of the Justice for Robin Bain group were ambivalent about David Bain's guilt/innocence prior to the retrial.  Joe Karam's circus has only promoted improved knowledge of what actually went on at Every St in 1994 and many can now see how much evidence David Bain left behind that points at his guilt rather than innocence.

In Karam's Book David and Goliath on page 203 Karam says Quote: I have no doubt that if the blood staining on Robin's clothing had been analysed for blood grouping, it would have been found to be the blood of deceased members of his family.

The blood has now been tested the results below.

Forensic scientist Dr Sally-Ann Harbison said samples taken from Robin Bain's bloodstained clothing were tested and the only full results were of his own DNA.

Martyn Van Beynen sat right through the retrial and his conclusions of guilt and innocence differe somewhat from the jury verdict.  In this Doco he reports some footage and testimony that highlight certain aspects of the case.

Part 2 is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-m4RTe3aK8