Witnesses testified that Laniet was scared of David.

Joanne Dryden a former teacher of Laniet Bain and another witness Marcelle Nader Turner testified at trial in 2009 that David’s sister Laniet Bain had a chance meeting with them the day before she died, Laniet had told them that David had organised a meeting for the Sunday night and that she did not want to go and that she was scared of David and that he was freaky.  Video HERE

David Bain's groomsman was a convicted criminal

Opinion: It was recently reported that David Bain's groomsman was convictered killer Paul Wilson, who served 15 years for raping and murdering a former girlfriend in 1994, about a month before the Bain murders.  Wilson stood beside Bain at the alter while he got married.  The other two groomsmen were Karam's two sons, with Matthew acting as best man.  Karam is quoted as saying: "They sort of naturally became ... very close friends.


Apparently one piece of circumstantial evidence can prove a murder case beyond doubt.  Michael Reed claims that the alleged residue marks on Robin's thumb as seen in the picture published on the 3rd Degree documentary slamdunk prove that Robin committed the murders because he loaded the magazines.

Why stop there?

Why David is Guilty

Opinion: This is a purely psychological analysis, based on a concept of what an educated and adjusted person in our society would do when faced with an allegedly false accusation of such grand scale as that which faced David Bain.

Putting the new "evidence" in perspective

Opinion: Someone has noticed marks on Robin's thumb which are consistent with loading the magazine on the rifle.  If we  hypothesise that these marks are not innocent and instead indicate that Robin loaded the rifle and therefore is responsible for the Bain murders, then we also have to interpret other items of evidence in the same incriminating manner.  Some examples: